I think that this question can be used in a situations. The one that I think is the best to use Ai-generated art is when photographing a certain landscape of background. Doing this you can use for multiple ideas. You can use it for ideas/inspiration, grading purposes, corrections, etc. I do believe people could use this for a art/photography class to help them with grading purposes.

A context you could not use this on I feel like is it for an Ai bot to not do a whole project/art project. Using an Ai bot for a whole project isn’t only risky but is also taking away the creative aspect from a person/student. Now like said above if someone were to use Ai to help grade or use as a rubric for their picture or advice that is one thing, but using Ai for an entire project is a whole another thing that could harm a students name.

c) How do you plan to integrate AI in your life going forward – whether personally or professionally? Do you feel you have a choice here, for example is deciding not to use AI an option?

I plan to continue using Ai in my life going forward in a big way. I plan to become a teacher and during this time I plan to have it help me make rubrics, project ideas, etc. I feel like I do have an option weather or not to use AI but I do think it could help me and benefit me in a big way.

The case study I will do is from last week Ai in academics. The article I really liked was Dinsmore and Fryer “What does GenAi mean for student learning?”. Here in this article I think it brings up muliple good points on weather Ai is good for using in school/acidemics. This article would and will be great since I want to teach and could help me and the students on weather to use or not use Ai.

We should be paying tons of attention to this topic in academics because as time and Ai evolve, it will only make it easier for kids to pass courses and class. It is getting harder and harder for some teachers to detect whether a kid or student is or has used Ai on an assinment.

When it comes to AI use in the classroom, in your professional lives, how do we determine how much is too much?

The question above is something that I feel like everyone ask themself when either writing and essay or completing an assignment. I think we can determine this by looking that the information that the Ai tool gave us and base it off that. I know that nowadays we have Ai generators where people can see how much Ai is detected but I think that when it comes down to determining how much is too much we can look at a few things. We can look at how long the assignment is, we can see how much information was given to us from Ai, and we can also see by just looking and seeing how much did Ai do and how much did I personally do.

A quote I found in the readings this past week is “To our second concern of whether genAI will “free us” to be creative in an academic domain in order to make advances in the sciences, arts, technology, and humanities, we need to examine whether simply providing more time for creative endeavors is likely to produce that result.” Here this explains that we can’t let Ai take over our creativity part of us and not let it take away our general knowledge of things as well.

For my group, we chose to look up our prompt on chatGPT. Here we used the prompt please make me a poem in the style writing of Shakespeare. In response to our prompt, chat gave us a very similar writing style to what Shakespeare actually would have wrote like. Our example that is gave us is attached:

Good morrow, sun, thou golden ball so bright,​
That peeks above the hills with merry cheer;​
I greet thee now with laughter and delight,​
And chase my dreams as thou dost draw me near.​

Mine wooden sword, a kingly blade I claim,​
I battle beasts no grown-up eye can see;​
A cardboard crown doth grant me noble name,​
And in my yard I rule a realm most free.​

When lessons call, I sigh yet still obey,​
For wisdom grows as seeds in fertile ground;​
Yet soon enough I’m loosed again to play,​
Where joys untold in simple things are found.​

So let me dream ‘fore sleep doth close mine eyes,​
A child today, tomorrow wondrous wise.

I would first like to say that I think being creative it different with anything and anyone. It comes from either how something is programed or how someone may see the world. Everything and everyone is different. Going to my prompt, I would like to argue that even though chat didn’t copyright any one of Shakespeares poems, chat did write something very similar to some of his writings. I think that chat did make a very creative pieces from what I told it to do. I think that in doing this experiment it did shift my opine on Ai creativity and see that Ai can be creative in what you tell it to do. I think that chat can definitely help me in the future now knowing the creative side of Ai use.

The prompt I put in what “Make me a schedule for my day to help me prepare for finals”. The people this prompt and answer I hot would be people who are looking for a good and easy study schedule to follow. The platform I used to get my answer was Claude. Here after plugging in my prompt, it gave me a step by step, hour to hour way to help me study for my exams that I may have. A connection I can make from readings or in class discussions is https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-prompting-best-practices. This is from checklist March 31st talking about how to use and maintain a good prompt to make it realistic and best as possible. A quote I got from this reading says” Claude responds well to clear, explicit instructions. Being specific about your desired output can help enhance results. If you want “above and beyond” behavior, explicitly request it rather than relying on the model to infer this from vague prompts.” Here it is just explaining to be clear and specific as possible to get the best outcome.

When I asked my prompt this is the answer I received from Claude.

Finals Prep Schedule (Afternoon + Evening)

🕒 3:15–3:30 PM — Quick Reset

📚 3:30–4:30 PM — Study Block #1 (Hardest Subject)

• ☕ 4:30–4:45 PM — Break
• 📘 4:45–5:45 PM — Study Block #2 (Second Hardest Subject)
• 🍽️ 5:45–6:30 PM — Dinner + Mental Reset
• ✏️ 6:30–7:30 PM — Study Block #3 (Easier Subject or Review)
• 🚶 7:30–7:45 PM — Break
• 📑 7:45–8:45 PM — Practice Session
• 🧹 8:45–9:00 PM — Organize for Tomorrow
• 🌙 9:00–10:00 PM — Light Review + Wind Down
• 😴 10:00 PM — Sleep

During class, me and my group researched AI hiring and the tools it uses. Here we found a lot of shocking and new information that I was not aware of. The biggest one being between a male and a female applicant, like yesterday the AI device is more bias toward the male body and the male application.

Now it does go through the whole process with both but overall, in the end it is more bias toward the male body than the female. I also found that AI only puts people in there job-fitting 40-67% of the time. I think this is a bad thing for AI to be doing because give or take 5-10% of the time people are not going to be doing what they applied for/what there job fit actually is. I do think though in the near future more and more companies will pick up of AI hiring and it will become more accurate and better through the years. I think that it will develop more but it will only come with time and trial.

Something I did learn and that is useful is that through the hiring process, it saves humans a ton pf time with going through hundreds and thousands of applications where humans can only do so much at a time. Also through the resume screening, AI has a 92-94% accuracy rate or picking the best candidates for the specific hiring.

ChatGPT information verified by-https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/10/amazon-hiring-ai-gender-bias-recruiting-engine?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20371?utm_source=chatgpt.com