Hello, my name is Andrew and I am from Cleveland, Ohio specifically north Ridgeville, Ohio and I am a first year/freshmen at the College Of Wooster. Here I play football and I am apart of another group of campus. In my free time I like to work out and hang out with friends. Here at the college I will be majoring in elementary education and maybe getting a minor or double majoring IS which is intervention specialist. In this class I am interested on how AI works in modern day with sports and data.

During class, me and my group researched AI hiring and the tools it uses. Here we found a lot of shocking and new information that I was not aware of. The biggest one being between a male and a female applicant, like yesterday the AI device is more bias toward the male body and the male application.

Now it does go through the whole process with both but overall, in the end it is more bias toward the male body than the female. I also found that AI only puts people in there job-fitting 40-67% of the time. I think this is a bad thing for AI to be doing because give or take 5-10% of the time people are not going to be doing what they applied for/what there job fit actually is. I do think though in the near future more and more companies will pick up of AI hiring and it will become more accurate and better through the years. I think that it will develop more but it will only come with time and trial.

Something I did learn and that is useful is that through the hiring process, it saves humans a ton pf time with going through hundreds and thousands of applications where humans can only do so much at a time. Also through the resume screening, AI has a 92-94% accuracy rate or picking the best candidates for the specific hiring.

ChatGPT information verified by-https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/10/amazon-hiring-ai-gender-bias-recruiting-engine?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20371?utm_source=chatgpt.com