In class on Tuesday, my group researched Serbia and its connections with AI while carefully examining what artificial intelligence is like in foreign countries. During class, we put a lot of emphasis on creativity and what it’s defined as. With Ai, it’s a hard topic to cover, everyone’s definition is different. After researching and reading Arriagada and Ais role in creativity, we came upon the definition of “Peoples generalized perception of creativity often involves the idea of inspiration, a mysterious muse that comes to the creators aid, an insightful burst of imagination.” After this and our class discussion on creativity, we were tasked to be experimenting with an LLM. We told our AI machine to write a poem like Shakespeare would, then had the class guess which one was human and which one was AI. Obviously, this is very difficult as some cannot tell the differences in what AI is human or if it isn’t. The poem our LLM came up with was a built off, more enhanced version of an older poem written by Shakespeare.

Example: Good morrow, sun, thou golden ball so bright,​

That peeks above the hills with merry cheer;​

I greet thee now with laughter and delight,​

And chase my dreams as thou dost draw me near.​

Mine wooden sword, a kingly blade I claim,​

I battle beasts no grown-up eye can see;​

A cardboard crown doth grant me noble name,​

And in my yard I rule a realm most free.​

When lessons call, I sigh yet still obey,​

For wisdom grows as seeds in fertile ground;​

Yet soon enough I’m loosed again to play,​

Where joys untold in simple things are found.​

So let me dream ‘fore sleep doth close mine eyes,​

A child today, tomorrow wondrous wise.​

Other Example: Let me not to the marriage of true minds​

Admit impediments; love is not love​

Which alters when it alteration finds,​

Or bends with the remover to remove:​

O, no, it is an ever-fixèd mark,​

That looks on tempests and is never shaken;​

It is the star to every wand’ring bark,​

Whose worth’s unknown, although his heighth be taken.​

Love’s not Time’s fool, though rosy lips and cheeks​

Within his bending sickle’s compass come;​

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,​

But bears it out even to the edge of doom.​

If this be error and upon me proved,​

I never writ, nor no man ever loved.​

These models demonstrated creativity by forming and building off human work in how creativity is defined by researchers. I believe the models are creative because the whole point of Ai itself is to be creative. Being a creative individual means that I use Ai in a way to broaden the spectrum of work. I like to use it to bring ideas to my mind along with letting it show what needs to get done. This is important, as AI allows for creativity at the hands of anything. Ask it any question, and it will deliver a very creative answer. I don’t see any risks to this in the form of a work context; all I find are benefits. The only risk I can think of is when ChatGPT does not properly upload correct information, instead keeping bias within answers. Overall, I think creativity is a fine definition for AI and solves what’s trying to get done pretty well.

Sources: OpenAI. (n.d.). ChatGPT. Retrieved April 9, 2026, from https://chatgpt.com/