The use of AI can be characterized by the extent to which it replaces individual learning and creativity. We use AI in our professional and personal lives so much that, in some way, we undermine our creativity. AI can be useful, for instance, when brainstorming or outlining ideas, but if professionals or students depend on it to handle all of the thinking or writing, it becomes a crutch that impedes growth. Generally, AI should complement human labor rather than take its place.
This week’s readings made me realize I should not rely on AI to do my work. I should only use it for brainstorming ideas. For example, we should not rely on AI to summarize a reading or a paper. As it can miss out on little details that we need to know.
Over time, a workforce that is tech-savvy, morally anchored, and creatively empowered can be shaped with the help of carefully planned AI policies. In the future, AI might start training humans for their job roles.
The use of AI to summarize papers can surely miss out on keypoints, but at the same time, using sparknotes to summarize a popular book also misses key points at times. AI will continue to diminish our creativity if used freely and frequently.
This reflection presents a balanced view on the role of AI in human learning and creativity. I appreciate how you highlight both the potential benefits and the risks of over-reliance. One area you might expand on is how AI policies could be structured to encourage responsible use and foster creativity, what kinds of safeguards, education, or limitations would you envision to ensure AI remains a tool, not a crutch?
You brought up an important point about AI becoming a crutch especially when we use it to replace our thinking rather than supporting it. I liked the way how you emphasized the importance of personal learning and creativity. I think it’s easy to fall into the habit of letting AI do too much, especially with how convenient it is.