I can imagine using AI-generated art. Like, while brainstorming and developing ideas. Without spending hours on preliminary drawings, writers, designers, or artists might utilize AI to produce mood boards swiftly, come up with visual ideas, or sketch rough drafts. AI art may also be helpful in social media and marketing, where short, eye-catching pictures are frequently needed for banners, posters, and background images, as originality is not that important in banners and posters.
However, there are several situations in which I would never think about utilizing AI-generated art. Which includes the creation of personal fine arts, such as family paintings or wedding pictures, where the human artist’s emotional depth and connection are crucial. Additionally, as AI may overlook crucial details or inadvertently misrepresent spiritual meanings, I would refrain from employing AI-generated art for cultural or heritage-based artworks, particularly when they deal with customs and histories.
Yes, I agree with you that AI can be very helpful especially in the graphic design occupational world. I had not thought much about that field’s usage of AI much! I will say however, that this would sacrifice some levels of creativity and probably eliminate a lot of jobs…but yes the integrity of authentic originality in media such as flyers and advertisement objects may not be the most vital thing to protect. Interesting point there.
I like how you mentioned the practical benefits of AI-generated art in brainstorming and marketing. Your point about using it for quick visuals where originality isn’t central makes so much sense.
This is a really balanced take and you showed a clear understanding of where AI art can be practical and where it just doesn’t belong. I liked how you pointed out that in areas like marketing, speed and visual impact matter more than deep originality, but when it comes to personal or cultural art, the human connection and emotional depth are irreplaceable.